Back

UK to Discuss Radical Plan for Reform of Accounting Practice

By David Waller in London

Editor's Note: Accounting standards are of abiding concern to auditors all over the world. Member SAIs may be interested to know about the ongoing debates for re­forms of financial reporting, in the United Kingdom. A news item of 11th October 1990 is reproduced below:

A RADICAL agenda for the reform of financial reporting in the UK will be considered next week by the Accounting Standards Board, the body for setting accountancy standards.

The agenda, if put into effect, would change the way balance sheets are drawn up and require listed compa­nies to publish profits forecasts.

It is the work of the Financial Reporting Action Group, a committee of four technical experts from the Eng­lish and Scottish institutes of, chartered accountants who are asked last year by the professional bodies to draw up an "action plan" for the reform of British accounting.

The group will present its find­ings to the Accounting Standards Board (ASB) on Monday next week. It will make five principal recommendations:

The ASB, which took over from the Accounting Standards Committee of the beginning of August, is committed to the fundamental reform of corporate reporting in the UK but is unlikely to proceed with any or part of the package without a period of extensive consultation with industry.

Even so, the ideas are likely to be at the centre of the intensifying debate on how financial reporting can be improved. The UK will be keen to establish a portfolio of authoritative accounting standards at a time when the European Commission is taking a mounting interest in the accounting area. The ECs new "Accounting Advisory Forum" is set to hold its first meeting next month.

Objections from the corporate sector are likely to focus on the recommendations that assets should be carried at current prices, and that companies should produce profits forecasts.

The revaluation process is expensive, requiring a professional assessment of the value of fixed assets every year and increased depreciation charges would reduce reported profits. Companies also regard information on their prospects as confidential.

Editor's Note: The Kautiaya Artitasastra is the oldest and most exhaustive treatise on the governance and administration of a state in India. It lists forty ways of financial improprieties, which is of topical importance even today. An authorised translation of the list from Samskrit is reproduced below.

- Book 2, Chapter 8, Section 20.

  1. What has accrued first is realized afterwards
  2. What is to accrue later is realized first
  3. What is to be carried out is not carried out
  4. What is not to be carried out is carried out
  5. What is carried out is made out as not carried out
  6. What is not carried out is made out as carried out
  7. What is carried out a little is made out as much
  8. What is carried out much is made out a little.
  9. One thing is carried out while another is made out (as carried out)
  10. What is carried out from one source is made out as from another
  11. What is to be paid is not paid
  12. What is not to be paid is paid
  13. Payment is not made in time
  14. Payment is made untimely
  15. A little paid is made out as much
  16. What is overpaid is made out as little
  17. One thing is given while another is made out as given
  18. What is paid to one is made as paid to another
  19. What is delivered (into the treasury) is made out as not delivered
  20. What is not delivered is made out as delivered
  21. Forest produce for which the price has not been paid is delivered
  22. That for which the price has been paid is not delivered
  23. Concentration (of goods) is made out as dispersal
  24. Dispersal made out as concentration
  25. An object of high value is changed for one of low value
  26. One of low value for one of high value
  27. The price is raised
  28. Or (the price is) reduced
  29. The year is made discrepant as to months
  30. Or the month is discrepant as to days
  31. Discrepancy as to source
  32. Discrepancy as to head (of income etc.)
  33. Discrepancy as to workmen
  34. Discrepancy in performance
  35. Discrepancy in the sum-total
  36. Discrepancy in quality
  37. Discrepancy in price
  38. Discrepancy in weighing
  39. Discrepancy in measuring, and
  40. Discrepancy as to (container) vessels